The application of both foundations feel similar and I used the same application technique on both sides of my face.
At first I was extremely impressed with this foundation for being Drugstore. I liked it more than many brands I work with on the regular. It was nearly undetectable from the MUFE. But I needed to know how it photographed. I pride myself as an artist that not only can make things look outstanding on film, but natural looking in person as well, which isn’t the easiest thing to do.
Behold, the results, keeping in mind that these looked almost identical to the naked eye. Lighting is the same on both sides.
These photos are uploaded directly from my camera, zero altering has been done.
With flash…
And in lower lighting… I was also having an allergy attack so sorry for the runnyish nose, hey at least I keep it real.
Both foundations had equal coverage to the eye, so if you’re looking for a nice looking foundation, I approve. However, it in no way compares to the Make Up For Ever HD which it is clearly a “knock-off” of. If you can’t tell which is which, the right side of my face (left side of the photo) is Revlon, and the left side of my face (right side of the photo) is MUFE.
If you’re a makeup artist trying to build a less expensive kit in the HD foundation department, I do not approve. Womp Womp!!
very interesting!!! is MUFF your favorite liquid foundation to use… in general on yourself and clients?
im sorry… meant to type MUFE***
No, it’s not my absolute favorite. I prefer Armani Luminous Silk and Dior Airflash for everyday makeup. For shoots I use MUFE a lot because it’s as beautiful on film as the others are in person and makes the photographers job a lot easier!